A blog about architectural tiles, terra cotta and other ceramic surfaces, architectural glass and ornamentation in and around New York.

Showing posts with label Rockefeller Center. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rockefeller Center. Show all posts

Friday, May 1, 2015

Socialist and Labor Architecture and Iconography in New York City

(Color photos courtesy of Michael Padwee unless otherwise noted)


“WE HAVE BEEN NOUGHT, WE SHALL BE ALL!”
Socialist and Labor Architecture and Iconography in New York City


I have always been interested in the ways architects and building owners decorated the facades of their buildings, and you can see this in the posts I’ve written on my two blogs. I have even taken hundreds of photos of architectural ornamentation in Park Slope, Brooklyn, where I live, and hope to publish them on the internet in book form one of these days. Due to my political leanings, I am also interested in socialist and labor iconography on building facades, as well as historic labor- and socialist-oriented buildings, residences and monuments. This article will touch on both.


The emblem of the General Society of Mechanics & Tradesmen on an interior wall of the auditorium at 20 West 44th Street, Manhattan.

In the last half of the nineteenth century through the end of World War II, German, Eastern European and Mediterranean immigrants brought their pro-labor and pro-socialist views and organizations to the United States. In New York City these organizations were especially strong, and helped to mitigate the exploitation of these workers and their families, as well as help pursue a progressive political and social agenda in the city and country as a whole. Some of their buildings also expressed these views.


The Italian Labor Center


231 East 14th Street, Manhattan

One example of labor iconography is the former Italian Labor Center, 231 East 14th Street, Manhattan. "Built in 1919, when this corner of the East Village was a mini Little Italy, it also served as the [the headquarters of Cloakmakers Local 48 ILGWU (Unione dei Cloakmakers Italiani)]. The old sign is still carved on the facade and is flanked by two interesting bas reliefs that seem to oppose each other. 





"The carving on the right depicts a man (a worker, with a shovel), woman, and baby seemingly content.





"On the left, however, the woman is suckling a snake, her hair electrified and her face contorted in pain. Her child is scrambling from her in terror. Her husband is in the background, hard at work digging or plowing, oblivious to the turmoil.* 'The carvings are probably the work of Onorio Ruotolo**, poet and sculptor, whose works in that period dealt with the theme of workers and their resistance to exploitation,' states The Lost World of Italian American Radicalism [written by Philip V. Cannistraro and Gerald Meyer].” (https://ephemeralnewyork.wordpress.com/2010/11/)  In my view the panel on the left signifies exploitation and terrorization of the workers by the capitalist snake, and the scene on the right the calmness and peace brought about after the defeat of capitalism through the collective action of the unions.


The Italian Labor Center was a hub of anti-fascist organizing beginning in 1923 when the Center hosted an anti-fascist conference organized by the Italian Chamber of Labor. (“Italians Here To Launch Drive On Fascisti April 2”, The New York Call, March 25, 1923, p. 9; http://fultonhistory.com/Newspaper%2014/New%20York%20NY%20Evening%20Call/New%20York%20NY%20Evening%20Call%201923/New%20York%20NY%20Evening%20Call%201923%20-%200890.pdf)  Architects John Caggiano, Matthew Del Gaudio and Anthony Lombardi employed innovative design and materials. The building later housed the Ukrainian Center for Social Research. (http://www.nysonglines.com/14st.htm)

*[Another interpretation is on p. 52 of the "14th Street and Union Square Preservation Plan": “A terra cotta set of panels above the center bay on the second story reads, 'ITALIAN LABOR CENTER.' Strikingly, this center panel is flanked by two decorative terra cotta bas reliefs which depict scenes of Italian, family, and labor-related significance. The eastern panel clearly shows a content family of working father, mother, and baby, the latter being cradled by his parents. The father holds a shovel in his left hand. The western panel illustrates the naked Roman goddess Minerva, patroness of craftspeople, next to a naked male child in the foreground before a shirtless laborer. The top of this central arch is capped by a band of wave scroll ornamentation.”]

**[“A sculptor and poet, Onorio Ruotolo (1888–1966) was born in Cervinara, Italy. He studied at the Royal Academy of Fine Arts in Naples and emigrated to the United States in 1908. The struggle and poverty he observed in New York City engendered in him a concern for society, which he expressed in cartoons, poetry, and sculpture. During World War I, he produced a number of sculptures showing the horrors of war. In 1914, he and Arturo Giovannitti became co-directors of Il Fuoco, a magazine of art and politics. After an ideological split, Ruotolo began Minosse, a socio-literary publication. In 1923 Ruotolo founded the Leonardo da Vinci Art School on Manhattan's Lower East Side. The school was created to provide arts education for New York's immigrant community, and it remained in operation for almost twenty years. In 1924 Isamu Noguchi took his first sculpture class at the Leonardo da Vinci Art School, and Noguchi began his artistic career with the academic sculpture that he created as Ruotolo's protégé.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onorio_Ruotolo)]



The Labor Temple


"242 West 14th Street at Second Avenue in Manhattan, New York City, was built in 1924 for the Labor Temple, "New York's most radical church". The Temple got a chapel, an auditorium, and a gymnasium, and the developers kept control of the commercial rental of the remainder of the building, which was designed by Emery Roth. The Labor Temple disbanded in 1957." (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:242_West_14th_Street_Labor_Temple.jpgBy Beyond My Ken (Own work) [GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)

On the same block as the Italian Labor Center is a building that was built as the New York City Labor Temple. “In April 1910, a plan to start "a center of aggressive religious work among the working-men of New York City, under the name of Labor Temple" was read in the meeting of the Home Missions Committee of the Presbytery of New York. The Reverend Charles Stelzle of the Board of Home Missions had drawn up the plan, hoping to establish a common ground where working men and churchmen could meet as equals, to show working men the interest the church felt in their welfare, and to foster mutual understanding and cooperation between labor and the Church. Stelzle's idea was to use an empty church at the corner of 14th Street and Second Avenue, to gather there all workers and churchmen who wished to meet, and to hold open fora, lecture series and classes dealing with social issues. Though care would be taken to express the Christian viewpoint, Stelzle wanted Labor Temple to be a place in which all ideas could be heard. The Presbytery of New York approved the plan, and Stelzle was appointed the director of Labor Temple.” (http://www.history.pcusa.org/collections/research-tools/guides-archival-collections/rg-14)

“The Labor Temple was a church but also a meeting space, union hiring hall, and school. Stelzle, a proponent of the social gospel, promoted the establishment of similar Labor Temples nationwide (although many of them were secular in nature). For years, the New York City Labor Temple was the center of the city's union life. But most local Labor Temple movements did not survive the 1930s.” (http://rememberthetrianglefire.org/resources/)



Triangle


Only the one word is needed to evoke the horror of that day.


The Triangle Shirtwaist Factory caught fire on March 25, 1911. (http://rememberthetrianglefire.org/resources/“The factory fire resulted in the fourth highest loss of life from an industrial accident in U.S. history. It was also the second deadliest disaster in New York City – after the burning of the General Slocum on June 15, 1904 – until the destruction of the World Trade Center 90 years later. 

“The fire caused the deaths of 146 garment workers, who died from the fire, smoke inhalation, or falling or jumping to their deaths. Most of the victims were recent Jewish and Italian immigrant women aged sixteen to twenty-three... . Because the managers had locked the doors to the stairwells and exits--a common practice at the time to prevent pilferage and unauthorized breaks--many of the workers who could not escape the burning building jumped from the eighth, ninth, and tenth floors to the streets below. 


“The fire led to legislation requiring improved factory safety standards and helped spur the growth of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, which fought for better working conditions for sweatshop workers. The women working for 14 cents an hour who died in the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire on March 25 of 1911 created a vast movement for change, which in the United States culminated in the right to organize, improved fire safety and working conditions, the Fair Labor Standards Act, minimum wage laws, the elimination of sweat shops, and more.



Asch/Brown Building, site of the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire. (2007 photo by Dmadeo: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Asch-brown-triangle-shirtwaist-fire-building.JPG)

“The factory was located in the Asch Building, at 23–29 Washington Place, now known as the Brown Building, which has been designated a National Historic Landmark and a New York City landmark.” (http://calfire.blogspot.com/2013/03/102-years-ago-triangle-shirtwaist.html)  The building has no distinguishing labor or socialist iconography, but there are monuments to the memory of the victims in local cemeteries. “A monument to six victims of the fire who were unidentified until recently was erected at the Cemetery of the Evergreens, which straddles the Brooklyn-Queens border.” (http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/09/23/nyregion/new-yorks-50-wait-theres-more.html?_r=0#/?gridItem=allAnother memorial can be found in the Calvary Cemetery in Queens, and a third in the  Workman’s Circle section of Mount Zion Cemetery in Queens.



“The site, erected in 1911, includes the original memorial for 14 of the 146 victims, their names inscribed on individual plaques. The site has since been expanded to memorialize all the victims of the horrible tragedy that left 146 workers dead.” (http://thefeministguide.com/2011/12/triangle-shirtwaist-factory-fire-memorial/)


Red Square Apartments




Someone on the Lower East Side--more specifically at 250 East Houston Street, The Red Square Apartments--brought home an unused statue of Vladimir Illyich Lenin from the ex-Soviet Union, and installed it on the roof of the building. From the ground, it looks like Lenin exhorting the workers at the Finland Station!



“The enemies of the workers are the capitalists of all countries. ...The capitalists strive to sow and foment hatred between workers of different faiths, different nations and different races.” (V.I. Lenin)


Actually, former NYU professor Michael Rosen developed the property that his wife’s grandfather had bought at city auction in 1961. The architects (1989-91) were Schuman, Lichtenstein, Claman & Efron. (Joyce Mendelsohn, The Lower East Side Remembered and Revisited, Columbia University Press, 2009, p. 225) “Michael Rosen, a former professor of radical sociology at NYU who, after finishing work on Red Square, concentrated on developing housing for battered women and AIDS sufferers.

“The 18-foot tall statue was a Soviet-commissioned heroic sculpture by Yuri Gerasimov, but when the USSR collapsed, the statue was never officially unveiled. Rosen’s co-developer, Michael Shaoul, found it in a dacha outside Moscow, and it has been part of the building since 1994 when it was purchased from Gerasimov. The [‘crazy’] clock[, also on the top of the building], by designer Tibor Kalman, was based on an “Askew” watch featured in a Museum of Modern Art collection, and in fact the design can still be purchased there.” (http://forgotten-ny.com/2010/11/red-square/. Michael Rosen later corrected this story about how he got the Lenin statue: “The statue of Lenin was found by a partnership of 3 guys named Walker, Ursitti and McGinnis (WUM). They had an art business in NYC and the USSR... . They asked me to invest with them in a painting they said was worth quite a bit, and as a part of the deal they located a monumental Lenin statue because I wanted one for the roof of Red Square, and also a much smaller bronze statue of a grandfatherly Lenin sitting on a park bench. No one from New York went to a dacha except the WUM guys.”)



Giuseppe Garibaldi

Giuseppe Garibaldi (1807-1882) was a radical Italian nationalist who, “after fighting in South American wars of liberation, using what today would be called guerrilla tactics, he organized and led insurgencies leading to conquests of Sicily and Naples which ultimately produced the unification of Italy in 1860. Abraham Lincoln offered Garibaldi a command in the Civil War, but Garibaldi asked for the post of commander-in-chief [and that slavery be abolished, both of] which Lincoln was unwilling to consent. Garibaldi resided in this house in Rosebank, on Staten Island’s Tompkins Avenue [420 Tompkins Avenue]...from 1851-53 with his friend, Antonio Meucci, who invented the telephone before Alexander Graham Bell received his own patent for it.



There is nothing architectural that would point to this house as being related to socialist or labor iconography. It was just the home of Garibaldi.

When Garibaldi died in 1882, a committee formed to commemorate the hero's stay on these shores. In 1884, Meucci was on hand when a plaque was placed over the front door of the house. After Meucci's death the house was turned over to the Italian Community to be preserved as a memorial to Garibaldi. (http://pub1.andyswebtools.com/cgi-bin/p/awtp-custom.cgi?d=garibaldi-meucci-museum&page=749)



Workers' Housing

“There was a time, in the first half of the last century, when secular Jews, mostly from Eastern European immigrant families, lived in service to a set of political ideals... . They saw their lives in terms of collective consciousness, and although that consciousness took different forms – some were Communists, some Socialists, some primarily Labor-Zionists – they lived in a way that few Americans do today. They thought of life in collective terms, more family of man than family of blood. Our lives, they believed, were closely tied together, and we should help each other through life’s struggles.” Four socialist and labor-oriented housing projects were founded in the Bronx as experiments in cooperative housing: the Communist Coops, the United Workers Cooperative Colony, a housing complex [begun in 1925-26 and completed in 1927-29] and populated by American Communists and their sympathizers; the Farband Houses, run by a Labor Zionist group; the Sholom Aleichem Houses, built by Yiddish-speaking socialists; and the Amalgamated Houses, founded by the garment workers’ union. 



The United Workers’ Cooperative Apartments in the Bronx

United Workers Co-op Colony Apartments/the Coops, 2700 Bronx Park East. (WPA Federal Writers Project: wpa_0516, 1937; http://nycma.lunaimaging.com/luna/servlet/detail/RECORDSPHOTOUN…OUNITMAY~3~3,RECORDSPHOTOUNITARC~25~25&mi=11&printerFriendly=1)

“The Bronx housing coops sprang from the desire of the Jewish garment workers in the Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union for fresh air and gardens and better places to live than their crowded difficult conditions on the Lower East Side. The city helped, opening up public transportation into the Bronx, where the land was cheaper and the air was cleaner.”
(https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/gangbox/g2CNG5Qg1e4/rqteurbQQW8J)  

Also, "[the] 1926 New York State Limited Dividend Housing Companies Law facilitated co-op development by giving tax abatements to housing developers that agreed to limit their profits to 6 percent and target low-income tenants." (Joshua B. Freeman, Working-Class New York: Life and Labor Since World War II, The New York Press, New York, NY, 2001, p. 110)





The Coops were constructed in Tudor Revival style and the architects were Springsteen & Goldhammer and Herman Jessor.



Lintel decoration over one of the doorways at The Coops.

The Coops residents were activists in many ways: “From the Coops, the residents set out to live their ideals. No one could be evicted if they couldn’t pay the rent. Consequently, the Depression put a strain on the Coops’ finances, and in 1933, it headed to bankruptcy, unable to pay its mortgage. However, responding to popular unrest, 24 states passed laws against mortgage foreclosures, including New York. It was in this political climate that the leaders of the Coops were able to negotiate a stay against foreclosure and remain the masters of their castle. Residents of the neighborhood surrounding the Coops, however, were not so lucky. So, when families in the neighborhood were faced with eviction, people from the Coops stepped in. ...The Coops were also at the forefront of breaking racial barriers. Coops residents organized to save the Scottsboro Boys... . And in the early ’30s, the Communist Party directed the Coops’ management to invite African-American families to move in. As a result, it became one of the first integrated housing complexes in the nation–and home to some of the only black kids in America to speak Yiddish.” (Joel Bleifuss, “Building Utopia”, In These Times; http://inthesetimes.com/article/4355/building_utopia)




The Sholem Aleichem Houses



The second large-scale socialist housing project was the Sholem Aleichem Houses (the Yiddish Cooperative Heimgesellschaft), completed in 1927 also by Springsteen & Goldhammer for 229 families on the site overlooking the Jerome Park Reservoir at 3451 Giles Place,  68 West 228th Street and Cannon Place. The origins of the Sholem Aleichem membership focused on the Workman’s Circle where "Yiddish culture trumped all other concerns." Politics, however, were also very important and brought a measure of discord. "...The cooperators had to create two Jewish schools, one for the socialists and one for the communists." (Matt A. V. Chaban, "At Beauty Queen's Former Home, Shades of a Bronx Utopia", The New York Times, January 13, 2015, p. A25) 

“Sholem Aleichem was the pen name of famed Ukrainian Yiddish writer Solomon Naumovich Rabinovich, whose works include Tevye the Milkman, on which Fiddler on the Roof is based. Sholem Aleichem Houses was devoted to its cultural mission, and included [three] artists’ studios, an auditorium for lectures and performances and cafeterias for functions. The complex, which has survived largely intact over the years, is made up of 15 five-story buildings comprising 229 apartments. Its neo-Tudor style was apparently unrelated to the values of the cooperative, but was a popular choice for residential architecture at the time. One of its most distinctive characteristics is the presence of beautifully landscaped inner garden courtyards.” (http://www.6tocelebrate.org/site/shalom-aleichem-houses/) Also, no two apartments were alike. The original cooperators were allowed to design their own spaces. ((Matt A. V. Chaban, op. cit.)



The Farband Houses

About the same time the Jewish National Workers Alliance--JNWA (Natsionaler Yidisher Arbeter Farband)--began planning the Farband Houses, two buildings for 127 families on Williamsbridge Road in the Bronx [at 2922 Barnes Avenue]. It was designed by the architects Meisner and Uffner and was completed in 1928. The JNWA was founded as a fraternal organization, like the Workmans Circle, but it was Zionist in orientation and became the backbone of Labor Zionism in the United States. 



The Farband Houses, 2014.


The Amalgamated Clothing Workers Houses

“Springsteen & Goldhammer also designed the Amalgamated Clothing Workers housing in 1927 on the edge of Van Cortlandt Park for 308 families. This was the largest of the labor/socialist cooperative projects with 700 families in 1931. (Richard Plunz, A History of Housing in New York City, Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1990, pp. 151-153)  



(Photo from  http://forward.com/articles/105180/a-utopian-bronx-tale/)


“Today, the 1,500-apartment Amalgamated Houses and two of the four buildings of the smaller Farband development remain limited dividend co-ops, meaning they can't be sold for a profit. ...The original Amalgamated co-operators put up $500 a room for their homes. By 1950, the purchase price had risen to $650 per room. Today's price is $3,000 per room--an increase that lags behind inflation. If they leave, residents must sell their shares back to the co-op, which then selects new purchasers from a waiting list. Carrying charges--the co-op equivalent of monthly rent--average $158 per room. [...The] co-op has declared itself a naturally occurring retirement community to better serve its long-time residents.” (Robert Neuwirt, “Radical Co-ops in the Roaring”, City Limits; http://www.citylimits.org/news/articles/3145/radical-co-ops-in-the-roaring)

In 2004 the Museum of the City of New York mounted an exhibit, “Radicals in the Bronx”, which focused on these four developments. Sarah Henry, the museum’s deputy director for programs and curator of the exhibit, commented that “’The founders of the co-ops saw themselves as the first step in the transformation to a better world... . They believed that the physical circumstances under which people live encourage collective action and identity, so these were intended to be more than affordable housing. Architecturally they were not stylistically radical but were much like what was being built for wealthier people in Bronxville... . They were built around courtyards and were near parks. Light and cross-ventilation were very important to people coming from tenements.’" (Nadine Brozan, “A Historical Look Back At Working-Class Housing”, The New York Times; http://www.nytimes.com/2004/11/07/realestate/07post.html?_r=0)

Many of these same groups founded summer camps for children and adults in the surrounding rural areas of New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Two of the more famous of these were Camp Kinderland and Camp Unity.

“Camp Kinderland was founded on Sylvan Lake in Hopewell Junction, NY in 1923 by members of the Workmen’s Circle who worked in the organization’s New York City schools. The camp’s founders sought to create a summer youth camp that would not only provide a recreational escape for the children of working people from the tenements of New York City, but also one whose culture would encourage and foster a commitment to socially progressive activism and the embracing of a rich Jewish secular tradition. The camp's founders, including some activists in the Communist Party, were associated with the left wing of the Workermen's Circle. From 1930 the Camp operated under the auspices of a branch of the International Workers order. In the 1950s, under the pressure of New York State "anti-subversive" investigations, it was incorporated independently.” (http://www.nyu.edu/library/bobst/research/tam/summercamps.html)

“[Camp] Unity[, founded in 1927, which]...called itself the 'first proletarian summer colony,' [and which...] would become the first interracial adult camp in the United States, purchased a permanent site in Wingdale, New York. In the late 1930's, returning Spanish Civil War veterans were given jobs and the opportunity for [physical] rehabilitation at Unity. During World War II, local residents joined with campers and staff to raise funds for the war effort. A vibrant cultural program attracted guests from more traditional resorts. Cold War harassment--including a 1955 investigation to uncover 'Communists' use of summer camps to indoctrinate and disaffect American youth...'-- and internal disputes over camp policy on such issues as 'white chauvinism' –- with camp management often taking a position different from that of the Communist Party -- resulted in declining attendance.” (http://www.nyu.edu/library/bobst/research/tam/summercamps.html)


The National Maritime Union Buildings

In the summer of 1966, towards the end of a six-week strike of caseworkers in the New York City Department of Welfare, Joseph Curran of the National Maritime Union, who had been mediating between my union and the City, invited us to hold a membership meeting in his fairly-new NMU building on Seventh Avenue between 12th and 13th Streets. The building evoked a massive ship, steady and rock-solid strong.



The ex-National Maritime Union building in 2014.

“New Orleans-based architect Albert C. Ledner designed three buildings for the National Maritime Union of America in the 1960s, all white buildings that prominently featured portholes as an architectural feature. The first, in 1964, was the union's headquarters building at Seventh Avenue between 12th Street and 13th Street, which became part of the now-closed St. Vincent's Medical Center; the second was the building at 346 West 17th Street, which runs through to 16th Street, which the union used as an annex to their headquarters; and finally the ‘pizza box’ building which became the Maritime Hotel, whose primary facade faces Ninth Avenue.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_Hotel) 


The other two NMU buildings on Ninth Avenue and West 16th Street. The "pizza box", and the Maritime Hotel just behind it.


The National Maritime Union building in Greenwich Village was eccentric-looking. “Mr. Ledner fancifully evoked seafaring themes in his commission for the National Maritime Union. The portholes are well known. Other nice touches include a rooftop elevator bulkhead reminiscent of a steamship’s smokestack. Joseph Curran, the union president, whose luxurious office occupied the ship’s bridge on the sixth-floor penthouse, described the building as ‘the box in which the Guggenheim Museum came.’

“Through the use of deep steel girders cantilevered from a thick concrete wall near the rear of the building, Mr. Ledner was able to convey the impression that the upper floors were floating above two circular hiring halls at ground level. In these halls, clad in glass block, about 1,000 seamen were assigned weekly to merchant ships sailing from New York. In 1973, the diminished union sold its headquarters to St. Vincent’s, which needed space.” The building became the O’Toole Building/Medical Center and was saved from being razed when St. Vincent’s closed. In 2011 the Landmarks Preservation Commission approved plans for the building to be reopened as an emergency care center, and it will be restored to its original concrete facade.

“Writing about the building in March 1964, Ada Louise Huxtable, who was then the architecture critic of The New York Times, noted that the union could have constructed a ‘cheap, dull, routine box’ or chosen something ‘vulgar and ponderous’ in marble.
‘It decided, instead, to go for architecture,’ she wrote. ‘Whatever reservations may be held, New York needs more of those decisions.’" (David W. Dunlap, “A Shiplike Building Gets Another New Life”; http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/05/nyregion/again-a-new-life-for-a-shiplike-building-in-the-village.html?partner=rss&emc=rss)


The Jewish Daily Forward Building

One of the most influential socialist newspapers for Jewish immigrants in New York was the Forward. "Launched as a Yiddish-language daily newspaper on April 22, 1897, the Forward entered the din of New York's immigrant press as a defender of trade unionism and moderate, democratic socialism. […U]nder the leadership of its founding editor, ...Abraham Cahan, the Forward came to be known as the voice of the Jewish immigrant and the conscience of the ghetto. It fought for social justice, helped generations of immigrants to enter American life, broke some of the most significant news stories of the century, and was among the nation's most eloquent defenders of democracy and Jewish rights.

"By the early 1930s the Forward had become one of America's premier metropolitan dailies, with a nationwide circulation topping 275,000 and influence that reached around the world and into the Oval Office. Thousands more listened regularly to the Forward's Yiddish-language radio station, WEVD… . The newspaper's editorial staff included, at one time or another, nearly every major luminary in the then-thriving world of Yiddish literature, from the beloved "poet of the sweatshops," Morris Rosenfeld, to the future Nobel laureates Isaac Bashevis Singer and Elie Wiesel." (http://forward.com/about/history/)  


The Forward Building, 173-175 East Broadway, Manhattan. (Photo taken by Jim.henderson is in the public domain; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jewish_Daily_Forward#mediaviewer/File:Jewish_Daily_Forward_bldg_jeh.JPG

“Designed by George Boehm, the midblock Forward Building still towers over the three- to five-story houses and tenements in the area. ...The cream-and-tan exterior has the same light tones and delicate terra cotta that Boehm used a few years later on the Chalif Dancing School, still standing at 163 West 57th Street. Above the second floor of The Forward Building, a series of relief busts depict four famous socialists, including Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Above them two oversize reclining figures in classical dress against a blue background flank a torch, an image that runs through the building's decoration.” (Christopher Gray, “Streetscapes/The Jewish Daily Forward Building, 175 East Broadway; A Capitalist Venture With a Socialist Base”, The New York Times, July 19, 1998; http://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/19/realestate/streetscapes-jewish-daily-forward-building-175-east-broadway-capitalist-venture.html)  



The four socialist medalions above the entrance.

“Completed in 1912[, it was in] a prime location, across the street from Seward Park. The building was embellished with marble columns and panels and stained glass windows. The facade features carved bas relief portraits of Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, (who co-authored, with Marx, The Communist Manifesto) and Ferdinand Lassalle, founder of the first mass German labor party. A fourth relief portrays a person whose identity has not been clearly established, and has been identified as Wilhelm Liebknecht,[a German social democrat and one of the principal founders of the German Social Democratic Party,] Karl Liebknecht,[a German socialist and a co-founder with Rosa Luxemburg of the Spartacist League and the Communist Party of Germany] or August Bebel[, a German socialist politician, writer, and orator, who is best remembered as one of the founders of the Social Democratic Workers' Party of Germany (SDAP)].” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Jewish_Daily_Forward)


Rockefeller Center

While Marx and Engels' visages still survive to decorate a New York City building, what about Vladimir Ilych Lenin?


”Man at the Crossroads was a fresco by Diego River a in the Rockefeller Center, New York. The painting was controversial because it included an image of Lenin and a Soviet Russian May Day parade. ...Nelson Rockefeller ordered its destruction before it was completed. Only black-and-white photographs exist of the original incomplete mural, taken when Rivera was forced to stop work on it. Using the photographs, Rivera repainted the composition [at the Palacio de Bellas Artes] in Mexico under the variant title Man, Controller of the Universe. ...The new version included a portrait of Leon Trotsky alongside Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels at the right, and others, including Charles Darwin, at the left and Nelson Rockefeller's father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., a lifelong teetotaler, seen drinking in a nightclub with a woman; above their heads is a dish of syphilis bacteria.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_at_the_Crossroads; photo courtesy of Wolfgang Sauber)

You wouldn’t think that Rockefeller Center would contain--or even allow--Socialist iconography to grace its walls, and you would be correct. It no longer does. However, in the 1930s, Marxist muralist Diego Rivera was commissioned by Nelson Rockefeller to paint a fresco mural in the newly built Rockefeller Center. Rockefeller Center contained many architectural works of art, some of them in the style of Socialist Realism, but Diego Rivera went too far for Nelson!


“Rivera's composition depicted many aspects of contemporary social and scientific culture. In the center, a workman was depicted controlling machinery. Before him, a giant fist emerged holding an orb depicting the recombination of atoms and dividing cells in acts of chemical and biological generation. From the central figure four propeller-like shapes stretched to the corner of the composition, depicting arcs of light created by giant lenses anchoring the left and right edges of the space. Rivera described these as ‘elongated ellipses’. Within these, cosmological and biological forces such as exploding suns and cell-forms were depicted. These represented the discoveries made possible by the telescope and the microscope. Between and beyond the arcs were scenes of modern social life. Wealthy society women are seen playing cards and smoking at the left. Opposite, on the right, Lenin is seen holding hands with a multi-racial group of workers. Soldiers and war machinery occupied the top left above the society women, and a Russian May Day rally with red flags was seen at the right, above Lenin. For Rivera, this represented contrasting social visions: the ‘debauched rich’ watched by the unemployed while war rages; and a socialist utopia ushered in by Lenin.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_at_the_Crossroads)

Sir Frank Brangwyn and José María Sert were commissioned to work alongside Rivera and supplement his lobby mural with murals of their own in the North and South hallways. After the destruction of Rivera's mural on Rockefeller’s orders in 1934, Sert, who detested Rivera, "had the opportunity to paint on arguably the most important wall in New York, if not America. Sert's 1,000 square-foot painting, American Progress, which replaced Rivera's fresco, is an allegorical scene of mankind building America." (Glenn 
Palmer-Smith, Murals of New York City, Rizzoli, New York, NY, 2013, p. 71)



Part of Jose Maria Sert's mural in Rockefeller Center.
In my opinion, there is no comparison. I prefer the original by Diego Rivera.



The Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau

One person in New York City who did more to help working class women to obtain knowledge of family planning, birth control and safe sexual practices was the feminist and socialist Margaret Sanger (1879-1966).

“In 1911, after a fire destroyed their home in Hastings-on-Hudson, the Sangers abandoned the suburbs for a new life in New York
City. Margaret Sanger worked as a visiting nurse in the slums of the East Side, while her husband worked as an architect and a painter. Already imbued with William Sanger's leftist politics, Margaret Sanger also threw herself into the radical politics and modernist values of pre-World War I Greenwich Village bohemia, where she joined the Women's Committee of the New York Socialist party. She took part in the labor actions of the Industrial Workers of the World, including the notable 1912 Lawrence Textile Strike and the 1913 Paterson Silk Strike and she became involved with local intellectuals, artists, socialists, and social activists including John Reed, Upton Sinclair, Mabel Dodge, and Emma Goldman. Her political interests, emerging feminism and nursing experience led to her 1912 column on sexual education entitled ‘What Every Mother Should Know’ and ‘What Every Girl Should Know’ for the socialist magazine the New York Call.” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Margaret_Sanger) 



17 West 16th Street (right), part of a row of nine Greek revival houses built c.1846 which have curving front bays, a Manhattan rarity. Each house was individually designated a NYC landmark in 1990. (Photo by “Beyond My Ken”; http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Beyond_My_Ken)

“Sanger was horrified by the infant mortality rate she witnessed [as a nurse on the Lower East Side of Manhattan] and in 1912 abandoned her career to advocate for birth control. She wrote and published a series of articles on sexually-transmitted diseases and contraception. The articles were considered obscene by the United States Government and were, therefore, illegal to mail under the restraints of the Comstock Act. Margaret Sanger fled the country to avoid prosecution in 1914. The uproar from women’s groups made the Sanger case an embarrassment for the government. All charges were eventually dropped and in 1915 she returned to New York to continue her campaign. In 1923 she opened the first physician-staffed clinic in the country for ‘the medically supervised study of contraceptive techniques.’ Seven years later the clinic had outgrown its space and Margaret Sanger’s husband, oil industrialist J. Noah H. Slee, purchased the house at 17 West 16th Street for the clinic's use. The Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau moved into the house in 1930, expanding its services.” (“The 1847 ‘Margaret Sanger Clinic’ House - 17 West 16th Street”, Daytonian in Manhattan; http://daytoninmanhattan.blogspot.com/2010/09/1847-margaret-sanger-clinic-house-17.html)  And now, ninety-two years later, political and religious ideologues are causing the closing of women's health clinics across the country. (One step forward, two steps back--an American phenomenon!)



The "Occupy" Movement and Liberty Park


Some photos from a ray of hope in a bleak economic and political landscape.














The free library.




My winning amateur entry in an "Occupy" photo competition.



Back to the USSR 

There are many more labor and socialist-related buildings and iconography throughout New York City not mentioned here, such as Trotsky's home in the Bronx and the Statue of Liberty engraved with the socialist, Emma Lazarus', poem, The New Colossus
 (another "one step forward,…" phenomenon in the United States); the short-lived bust commemorating the incredible whistleblower, Edward Snowden, in Brooklyn's Fort Greene Park and the newly rediscovered labor mural by Max Spivak at 111 West 40th Street, Manhattan, but I couldn't include everything. 

However, I did want to end this survey on a whimsical note. There are many ex-Soviet immigrants in the Coney Island and Brighton Beach areas of Brooklyn, and there are many excellent restaurants serving traditional foods of the ex-Soviet republics. Below is one such restaurant facade which combines the Beatles with Soviet iconography.




I never had the chance to eat at this restaurant, though, as the windows were papered over. The restaurant was being "renovated" (read closed) when these photos were taken, and the signs disappeared shortly thereafter.




Update: Renaissance Casino and Ballroom Complex Demolished

As reported in the New York Times, another historic site, the Renaissance Casino and Ballroom Complex on 137th Street and Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. Blvd. in Manhattan, was demolished in April by a development company. These were the only known buildings existing in this area decorated with rare Tunisian Tile Company tiles made by the Chemla family in Tunisia. The tiles were not saved, either.


Sunday, September 1, 2013

LEON VICTOR SOLON: COLOR, CERAMICS AND ARCHITECTURE


Leon V. Solon
(from E. Stanley Wires, "Decorative Tiles, Part
III, Their Contribution to Architecture and
Ceramic Art", New England Architect and
Builder Illustrated, No. Sixteen, 1960)
For a brief period during the first half of the 20th century there was a movement in the United States to put color in architecture, more than the color of the materials used. This movement had its roots in the Art Nouveau and Arts and Crafts styles and had a leading theorist in an Englishman originally from the pottery district of Stoke-on-Trent.

Leon Solon was intrigued with the possibilities of color when he worked as a designer in England, before he emigrated to the United States in 1909.  John Hopper, a textile and design historian, discussed some of Solon's color and design work as it pertained to textiles: "Although mostly known for his ceramic work, Solon did produce decorative work in a number of disciplines including textiles. It is unknown to what extent his textile work was commercially produced. The textile design shown...which was called Allegorical Figures and was produced in about 1893, is said either to be the only textile design produced by Solon, or at least the only remaining documented piece. That the design had some value in its own right is shown by the fact that it was printed by Wardle & Co, the prestigious textile printing company that had...a close relationship with William Morris and the Arts & Crafts movement. This printed design, which could be bought on both silk and velvet, is an extraordinary piece of work, particularly for an English design. Solon was a keen purveyor of the general European Art Nouveau movement and was an important contributor to the style when he worked at Minton's. However, he was much more specific in his tastes and championed the Austrian version of the movement, popularly known as the Secession*. [...Solon's] ideas regarding contemporary decoration were somewhat more adventurous than many of his English contemporaries, and certainly more Eurocentric." (John Hopper, "The Allegorical Figures of Leon Victor Solon", The Textile Blog, Nov. 10, 2010, http://thetextileblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/allegorical-figures-of-leon-victor.html)


Leon Solon, "Allegorical Figures" textile design, c. 1893. Used with the permission of John Hopper and Design.Decoration.Craft at The Textile Bloghttp://thetextileblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/allegorical-figures-of-leon-victor.html.

In a paper read by Thomas Wardle at the Applied Art Section of the Society of Arts on May 7, 1895, Leon Solon is mentioned as one of the talented, new textile pattern designers: "I have thought it would be fitting to exhibit a few designs for silk fabrics, chiefly for dress, by a few pattern designers who aspire to be useful in the ornamentation of British silks. Amongst them Mr. Walter Crane has one-design for printed silk for hangings and cushions ; Mr. Lewis Day and Mr. Lethaby have one each; Miss Clowes...is here exhibited for the first time..., Mr. Leon Solon (the artistic son of an artistic father), Mr. Rigby, of Leek, Mr. Mawson, and one of my sons, trained to pattern designing, have each contributed a few designs of their own." [Solon had two designs for printed silk exhibited.] (Thomas Wardle, "On the Improvements in the Designing, Colouring, and Manufacture of British Silks Since the Egerton Exhibition of 1890", Journal of the Society of Arts, Vol. XLIII, No. 2,219, May 31, 1895, pp. 666+)


"Solon himself was a keen purveyor of classical themes which he often tied into the Art Nouveau styling of elongated figures, foliage and nudes. However, although there were elements of individual interest and exploration within Solon's work, at the heart of his style at least during the Art Nouveau period was his obvious admiration and indebtedness to Central European contemporary styling. The ceramic work he produced for Minton was much closer to the Germanic interpretation of Art Nouveau than it was of either the French or Belgian. To some extent this can be seen in this particularly early design piece by Solon. The textile design contains features that would not look amiss in either the early German Jugend or Austrian Secessionist forms that were to become such highly popular and alternative versions of Art Nouveau." (http://thetextileblog.blogspot.com/2010/11/allegorical-figures-of-leon-victor.html)


*["The development of the Art Nouveau movement as it spread across Europe was shaped in part by a group of rebel Viennese artists who had turned their backs on the Establishment. ...The city’s young intellectuals, the artists, writers and scientists, looked to the new century for a new beginning. For its artists, it came with the founding of a new society – the Secession – which, unlike Vienna’s long standing traditional Society of Artists, was intended to raise concern for art in the city and promote contact with artists abroad. It was founded by Gustav Klimt, Kolo Moser, Josef Hoffmann and Joseph Maria Olbrich. They decided to form their own exhibiting society and to publish a magazine called Ver Sacrum... . At the same time Minton was casting around for new ideas and with this European roots, Léon was eager to contribute. His first designs in 1898 were based on the principles of the Viennese movement and named Secessionist ware, underlining the Secession Movement’s impact even in North Staffordshire." (Christopher Proudlove, "Minton’s Secessionist Ware is an epitaph to designer Leon Solon"; http://writeantiques.com/mintons-secessionist-ware-is-an-epitaph-to-designer-leon-solon/)]


 (From the Fine Art Society, London, as reproduced by the Victorian Web)
A color reproduction of Leon Solon's "Allegorical Figures" textile design. Printed tussah silk: 286 x 168.75 cm; 114 x 67 1/2 inches. (http://www.victorianweb.org/art/design/textiles/37.html)




Solon was influenced by the Arts and Crafts principles espoused by William Morris. "...Morris, a contemporary of Dresser, is the most famous of the Arts & Crafts pioneers and probably the most influential figure involved in nineteenth century textile production. His legacy lies not only in his approach to design but also in his methods of manufacture as well as his views on the role of the designer and craftsman. ...Morris's dislike of commercial production and chemical dyes led him to traditional earlier techniques such as handloom Jacquard weaving and the use of vegetable dyed hand-block printing. ...Thomas Wardle worked closely with Morris in experimenting with vegetable dyes. His travels to India also influenced his work, both in terms of design...and the type of silk he used. He printed Leon Victor Solon's only known textile design, which is considered one of the most beautiful figurative patterns from the Arts & Crafts period." (The Fine Art Society, "Victorian Textiles and Textile Design: An Introduction"; http://www.victorianweb.org/art/design/textiles/intro.html)


A doublure--an elaborately decorated vellum or leather inner cover of a book--of "L'Art dans la décoration extérieure des livres", designed by Leon V. Solon. The colors are Deep Green, two shades of Blue, Grey and Gold. (Kineton Parkes, The Sutherland binding, Printed for Private Circulation, Newcastle-under-Lyme, England, 1900)
In 1897 Solon assumed the position of art director of bookbinding for George Thomas Bagguley at Newcastle-under-Lyme. Bagguley had been the librarian of the Duke of Sutherland's library. Solon created book binding designs for the new “Sutherland Decoration”. 


("Studio-Talk", The Studio, Vol. XXX, No. 2, Nov. 1903, p. 158)
These designs were hand-tooled in color by Mr. Bagguley. “Hitherto colour-decoration has been applied to leather-binding either by painting or staining, by inlaying, or by embroidery. Now Mr. Bagguley tools the pattern itself in brilliant permanent colours… . The designs by Mr. Leon Solon were made especially for the particular volumes they adorn… . That the ‘Solon’ designs in the ‘Sunderland [sic] Decoration’* will be the prize of collectors is a safe prophecy, for everything that makes binding a fine art is obeyed here, plus the novelty of colour, which is their own entirely.” (E.B.S., “Studio Talk”, The Studio, Vol. 12, No. 2, 1898, pp. 122-124)
*[“Patented by the Staffordshire binder George Thomas Bagguley (b. ca. 1860), the inventive Sutherland bindings (named after the Duchess of Sutherland) are characterized by vellum doublures that are elaborately decorated with gilt and colored tooling. ...Established in 1890, the Bagguley firm employed a number of outsiders to design bindings (including Leon V. Solon, Dorothy Talbot, and Charles Connor), and although the bindery operated for only a few years, its output was distinguished.” (Stephen J. Gertz, “More Magnificent Bindings, Bound to be Great”, Booktryst: A Nest for Booklovers, October 26, 2011; http://www.booktryst.com/2011/10/more-magnificent-bindings-bound-to-be.html)]

A doublure of "Queen  Elizabeth", designed by Leon V. Solon. The colors are Rose Pink, two shades of Veronese Green, Pale Blue and Gold. Solon also designed another doublure for Richard Holmes' Queen Victoria (Kineton Parkes, The Sutherland binding, Printed for Private Circulation, Newcastle-under-Lyme, England, 1900)

"[Solon] also worked as a painter, sculptor and illustrator. [He] exhibited at the Royal Academy and Royal Society of British Artists in London and the Royal Society of Artists in Birmingham, England, between 1897-1905... ." (http://www.achome.co.uk/antiques/international_decorative_arts.htm) Solon also created artistic bookplates during his career:


An art nouveau bookplate created by Leon Solon. (Photo courtesy of Lew Jaffe)

Leon V. Solon was born in England in 1872 "to a family of distinguished ceramic artists at Stoke-on-Trent... ." Leon was the son of "Marc Louis Emmanuel Solon...[who] had been hired in 1870 from the French national factory at Sevres to become head decorator at Minton's [in England]. ...Leon's maternal grandfather, Leon Arnoux, had been a highly accomplished ceramist at Sevres when Herbert Minton hired him to be his art director" from 1849-1892. Leon studied "...classical art...[and] was also trained to understand the practical aspects of contemporary ceramics manufacturing." (Riley Doty, "British Tile Makers in the United States: 1910-1940", Journal of the Tiles & Architectural Ceramics Society, Vol. 17, 2011, pp. 8-11)

Solon, like "...many other Staffordshire natives,...was raised in the tradition of practical potting. But...Solon [also] possessed a wide knowledge of ceramics manufacturing because, through family tradition, he had been trained to be a company art director. ...In this industry where style was a major sales device, practical men responsible for deciphering consumer taste--that is, factory art directors--were labor aristocrats... ." (Regina Lee Blaszczyk, "'This Extraordinary Demand for Color': Leon Victor Solon and Architectural Polychromy, 1909-1939", Flashpoint, the Newsletter of the Tile Heritage Foundation, Vol. 6 No. 3, July-September 1993, p. 1)

"Solon's formal education provided him with a strong practical foundation in ceramics and exposed him to the methods, theories and techniques of British industrial arts practice. ...his formal training was complemented by the indoctrination to classicism he received from [his father,] Louis Solon. Under his father's tutelage, Solon developed an expertise in the art and architecture of the ancient world, including a knowledge and understanding of Greek polychromy...," which was very influential in Solon's future theories. (Regina Lee Blaszczyk, p. 10) Solon was raised in the late nineteenth century when "there was intense interest in the presence of color on ancient sculpture[,...] largely inspired by an 1886 exhibit in Berlin directed by archaeologist Georg Treu in which...painted casts of ancient works were displayed, correcting the impression that they had only ever been white." (Jarrett A. Lobell, "Not Quite Ancient", Archaeology, Vol. 66, No. 4, July/August 2013, p. 10)


An early Minton Secessionist twin handled vase c. 1905 by Leon Solon and John Wadsworth of inverted trumpet form, with twin ear shaped handles and tubelined laurel swags in shades of blue and purple, with a cream roundel to the neck. A stunning example of the Art Nouveau style introduced by Solon and Wadsworth.  (Photo courtesy of Nick Cashin, "UK Pot Heads" blog; http://ukpotheads.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/minton-secessionist-vase.html)

Partially as a result of favorable publicity in The Studio, an influential periodical, Leon Solon was hired by Mintons. While chief designer at the Mintons pottery in Stoke-on-Trent, "Solon and...John W. Wadsworth...collaborated to create 'Secessionist Ware' in an attempt to capture the market for art nouveau home decorations for Minton. ...Solon and Wadsworth created a brilliant palette for Secessionist Ware that foreshadowed Solon's later work in architectural faience." (Blaszczyk, p. 10) There are disagreements, however, as to who actually created the major part of the designs.


A 12-tile Secessionist-style panel designed by Leon Solon. (Photo from the  Woolley & Wallis auction website: http://www.woolleyandwallis.co.uk/PrintLot?id=225963)

"Solon’s first work for Mintons was in flat patterns for tiles and decorative panels. Various...techniques used in the secessionist ware came directly from both the tile production and [Mintons'] ‘Angloia’ range of pottery, including block-printing, relief moulding and slip trailing. ... The early pieces are all designed by Solon and are mostly overtly art nouveau in shape, pattern and even colour. These early pieces feature peacocks, flowers and various art nouveau trailing motifs. They are produced in a variety of techniques usually combining moulded relief with block printing. The basic shape would be produced in some quantity in moulds incorporating the raised relief. These would then be passed to decorators who would add the block printing where required and then colour the pieces with lead glazes. They would be encouraged to be quite loose in their technique so that runs and irregularities could be seen. This in effect meant that the pottery was a combination of industrial production and ‘art pottery’ finish." (http://mintonobsessionist.wordpress.com/what-is-minton-secessionist/)


Secessionist ware is further "...characterised by bold Art Nouveau designs of highly stylised, often powerfully organic plant forms, applied as either moulded or slip-trailed raised outlines. These are filled by transparent lead (majolica) glazes in a palette of sludgy greens, yellows and reds, and soft blues. From the beginning [also] appears a strong purple and blue combination which always seems...to have a particularly intense Art Nouveau character." (Simon Wilson, "Mintons Secessionist Ware : a Triumph of English Art Nouveau", http://mintonobsessionist.wordpress.com/2012/06/23/mintons-secessionist-ware-a-triumph-of-english-art-nouveau/)
"...Solon had favoured blues, greens, and turquoise grounds with sand and salmon pink decorations. Wadsworth introduced stronger colours, especially reds, pinks and blues." (http://mintonobsessionist.wordpress.com/what-is-minton-secessionist/)


As an artist Leon Solon painted scenes from novels and plays that were reproduced in the published volumes or as advertising posters. One poster which was painted by Solon while still in England was for Aristophanes' "The Frogs."


(Charles Hiatt, Picture Posters, George Bell and Sons, London, 1895)
In the United States Solon illustrated books like Zona Gale's Christmas and The Loves of Pelleas and Etarre.


Book jacket art work created by Leon Solon. (Zona Gale, Christmas, 
The Macmillan Company, New York, NY, 1912)


Solon's Tiles



One of Solon's pictorial, Persian-style designs for AET. "The Persian Warrior of the Twelfth Century (Cloisonnè outline in Gobelin glazes)" (Evelyn Marie Stuart, "Art Tiling: Its Place in Architecture and Decoration", Fine Arts Journal, Vol. 29, No. 6, Dec., 1913, p. 742)
Solon emigrated to the United States in 1909, and "...In 1912 [he] became art director at the American Encaustic Tiling Co. [AET]... . ...Leon's role was to direct the overall development of AET's tile lines." (Riley Doty, "British Tile Makers in the United States: 1910-1940", Journal of the Tiles & Architectural Ceramics Society, Vol. 17, 2011, pp. 8-11) Solon "encouraged a change of direction in the production [of tiles] to the more hand-crafted appearance much in vogue during the building boom of the 1920s." (Suzanne Perrault, "The Development of the American Art Tile Industry", in The Fourth Annual Summer Tile Show, The Perrault-Rago Gallery, Lambertville, NJ, June 22nd through July 6th 1997, p. 4)

Two large AET faience tile panels made for the Empire State Dairy, 2840-2844 Atlantic Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11207 (Kings County) between Barbey Street and Schenck Avenue. Designed c. 1913 when Leon Solon was AET's Artistic Director. (https://sites.google.com/site/historictileinstallationsn/ny_brooklyn--empire-state-dairy-tile-panels)
While at AET, Solon encouraged artists from varied disciplines to design tiles. The artist Arthur Crisp, for instance, designed two large faience tile panels, which were exhibited at the Architectural League of New York.
(Photos of these panels can be found in "The Architectural League of New York and Its Relations to Crafts and Manufactures" by H. Van Buren Magonigle in The American Architect, Volume 121, No. 2387, Feb. 15, 1922, pp. 166-167, and in the Year Book of the Architectural League of New York..., Vol. 37, 1922. Both panels were part of the annual exhibition of the Architectural League of New York.)



Another series of tiles was created for the Aztec Ballet. The Aztec Ballet was created by the Mexican composer Carlos Chávez (1899-1978), who "became the first Mexican composer to recapture the spirit of pre-Columbian culture in his music. [...Chávez] found a legend in Aztec mythology that he considered appropriate, which dealt with the ceremony signifying the renewal of life after the fiftytwo-year Aztec 'century' by means of a new gift of fire from the gods. ...In 1928 the Ballet was to be produced in New York City. Based on motifs in Augustin Lazo's costume design for the ballet, the Cheney Silk firm and the American Encaustic Tile Company...made products that were to be introduced simultaneously with the ballet production." (Robert L. Parker, "Carlos Chávez and the Ballet: A Study in Persistence", Dance Chronicle, Vol. 8, No. 3/4 (1985), pp. 180, 184)


(E. Stanley Wires, "Decorative Tiles, Part III, Their Contribution to Architecture and Ceramic Art", New England Architect and Builder Illustrated, No. Sixteen, 1960)
"[...The] board of the Metropolitan Museum of Art displayed [the tiles] in an International Exhibition of Ceramic Art in 1928... ." (Robert L. Parker, "Carlos Chávez and the Ballet: A Study in Persistence", Dance Chronicle, Vol. 8, No. 3/4 (1985), p. 184)

Leon Solon designed the facade and showrooms of the American Encaustic Tiling Company at 16 East 41st Street in Manhattan using a planned glaze color scheme... . The street entrance and facade were decorated with polychrome faience, including a bear's head over the entrance. Solon designed the showrooms  "...as a virtual 'Tile Museum', as a showplace for parading the decorative potential of colorful architectural ceramics. ...If the exterior of the...showroom [the building facade] was the epitome of understatement, the building's interior communicated chromatic splendor that must have bedazzled architects and persuaded many to utilize tiles in their installations. ...This main display area, a virtual symphony in distinctive hues of brilliant blues, greens and gold, was Solon's tribute to maiolica potters of the Italian Renaissance.”  (Regina Lee Blaszczyk, " 'This Extraordinary Demand For Color': Leon Victor Solon and Architectural Polychromy, 1909-1939" in Flashpoint, the Newsletter of the Tile Heritage Foundation, Vol. 6, No. 3, July-September 1993, p. 14)



"The manner in which these strongly contrasting Aetco-Persian faience tiles are arranged follows the pattern-plan found on certain mosque towers of northern Africa; in those examples we find harmony established in an assembly of brilliantly colored patterns, by means of a method of pattern grouping. It is a species of alternation, or checker, in which one pattern is constant; the other alternating unit in the checker has the maximum degree of variation." (Leon V. Solon, "The Display Rooms of a Tile Manufactory", The Architectural Record, Vol. LII, No. 5, Nov. 1922)

(This photo and the photo below courtesy of the Tile Heritage Foundation)



"In 1927, Solon lamented the 'dull and lifeless buildings of today' and called for increased use of color in skyscrapers. 'A soothing green would be suitable for localities like the Wall Street district where nerves are subject to constant excitement,' he wrote. At 16 East 41st Street Solon found the opportunity to put such theories into practice. The interior was a polychromed labyrinth of tile art, with majolica fountains, faience radiator grilles, niches, cornices and even ceilings in intensely shaded red, blue, gold, green and other colors. [...For] the exterior Solon sought a more subdued, neutral character. On a wall of light yellow roughened stucco, he laid out a polychrome network -- deep, burnt umber door and window enframements on the first floor, brilliant blue and gold heraldic plaques at the midsection and cream-and-blue rectangular patterns of square tile at the attic story." (Christopher Gray, "Terra Cotta Magic With a Polychromed Interior", New York Times, "Streetscapes" column, July 20, 1997; http://www.nytimes.com/1997/07/20/realestate/terra-cotta-magic-with-a-polychromed-interior.html?src=pm)


Tiled facade, 16 East 41st Street, removed in 2013. (Photo courtesy of Michael Padwee)



Solon left AET about 1928. He then worked as a consultant and art director at the Mosaic Tile Company, the Robertson Art Tile Works and the U.S. Quarry Tile Company. (Blaszczyk, p. 10)


(Frank W. Purdy, "American Art for America", Arts & Decoration, Vol. XVI, No. 4, Feb. 1922, p. 270)


Color in Architecture

Regina Lee Blaszczyk, an historian of the use of color in commerce, states that a "color revolution turned the drab Victorian city into a brilliant modern showcase of terra cotta, electric light, sound, and paint. ...New public buildings, whether classical or Art Deco in style, were colorized and modernized with electric lights, ceramic tiles, murals and bright paints. ...The [terra cotta] industry employed sculptors to create stock designs or to customize designs in the Beaux-arts and Art Deco styles, and boasted its own theorist: Léon Victor Solon." (Regina Lee Blaszczyk, The Color Revolution, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012, pp. 191, 196-197)

“Architectural Polychromy” is the title of a six-part series of essays that Leon Solon wrote for The Architectural Record in 1922. This followed two other essays published in The Architectural Record in 1918, “The Greek System of Architectural Polychrome Decoration” and “Principles of Polychrome in Sculpture Based on Greek Practice”, all of which put forth Solon’s theory that the most virile and spontaneous period of Classical Greek architecture--the 4th, 5th and 6th centuries B.C.E.--used color as an architectural resource, subordinate to architectural properties “...in a rigid adherence to certain decorative conventions… . [...The] Greek polychrome method...teaches us the principles governing color location, color adjustment in ornamentation, and the manipulation of light as the means of developing color interest in the uniformly applied tone--the only form in which color may be used in architecture… .” (Leon V. Solon, “Architectural Polychromy: Part I”, The Architectural Record, Vol. 51, No. 1, January 1922, p. 7)


In an earlier article, Solon noted that “In a race preeminent in philosophy and in the analysis of abstractions, we might assume that color would have enjoyed the free rein accorded poetry or music. This, however, was not the case, and extremely rigid rules controlled [...color’s] application when embellishing architecture…, according to archaeologists like Borrmann, who conducted extensive research into color usage at the Olympia excavations. (Leon V. Solon, “The Greek System of Architectural Polychrome Decoration”, The Architectural Record, Vol. XLIII, No. 4, April 1918, p. 323-324, 326, 332)


In 1927 The National Terra Cotta Society published a “color wheel” for architects who wished to utilize color on buildings constructed with terra cotta. The front page of this four page cardboard brochure featured part of a building facade with colored areas and holes cut into parts of the design. The color wheel is attached to the inner page and is turned to illustrate the proper colors to be used with each other. The explanation of the use of the color wheel could have been written by--and may actually have been written by--Leon Solon, as it follows his views on color use in architecture. The six colors on the wheel “illustrate certain principles of successful coloration more or less common to every problem of design. There are no invariable rules which limit, much less prohibit, the use of color in architecture, but there are principles which should govern the amount and quality of color used in any specific application. So long as the distribution of color does not impair the sense of structural function in features which should properly express this, color may be freely used. [Color] is often the final touch necessary to give form its fullest significance[,] and when not found appropriate to a structural member may be used as a foil in related features not structural… .” (National Terra Cotta Society, “Suggestions for Color Effects in Terra Cotta”, 1927)

The National Terra Cotta Society color wheel. The maroon, blue and orange colors  are part of the wheel attached to the back of the front page.

This brochure also discusses the principles to remember when choosing a color scheme. “...generally, warm colors advance while cool colors recede. This is important [...when] color is used in connection with shadow or to accentuate the apparent projection of relief and depth of background recesses. ...In handling the relation of color areas to each other, the larger areas should be duller or less intense than the smaller. This is very necessary where these are designed to appear in the same surface plane. ...Weight, strength and mass are suggested by the duller…, cool colors [...which] may be employed effectively for the base and lower part of a building[…;] the more intense, warmer and luminous colors [may be] used in treatment of the upper levels and their decorative detail. The use of complementary colors is an important aid to securing emphasis in decorative features and achieving a balanced color effect. Juxtaposition of the complements will tend to increase the apparent intensity of each… .” (National Terra Cotta Society, “Suggestions for Color Effects in Terra Cotta”, 1927)

In 1917 Solon analyzed the reasons why colors were not being appropriately utilized with terra cotta construction. Solon believed that modern designers inappropriately used colors by blindly following Renaissance styles, which used colors on areas of buildings that did not need coloring. Instead, he suggests that designers should look to the color schemes used by the classical Greek potters: “In analyzing the colored ornamentations on the Greek vases the foremost characteristic...is that form is primarily expressed by silhouette, decorative rhythm and contrast being attained by careful calculation of the relative value of motif and field.” As one example of this Solon writes, “An examination of ornamental sculpture decorating buildings erected in Greece during the fourth and fifth centuries, B.C., when polychrome was extensively used both in architecture and sculpture, reveals a number of examples carved with a very distinctive technique, differing essentially from the conventional renderings of such motifs, by the manner in which the edges of reliefs are treated. [emphasis mine] ...The peculiarity of this method is that the contour of the forms is bounded by a narrow, delicately embossed fillet giving additional projection to the edge…[, which is different from the Renaissance tendency to efface certain edges]. ...The light falling on the raised edge of the fillet, accentuated by its delicate shadow, adds an appearance of richness and softness to the colors which is unattainable by other means.”  (Leon V. Solon, “Architectural Polychrome Decoration: An Analysis of Fundamental Principles”, The Architectural Record, Vol. XLII, No. 5, November 1917, pp. 454-457) This can be observed in some of Solon’s faience murals created when he was the artistic director of AET.


A muted background color with brighter blue, red and yellow on a filleted, raised design show the subject to its best advantage. (The Architectural Record, Vol. XLV, No. 1, Jan. 1919, cover)



Solon does acknowledge that science has advanced greatly in the areas of ceramic production and glazes since the fourth century BCE and allows for this when considering using colors in modern architecture and ceramics. 

In 1924 one reviewer took Solon to task in a review of his book, Polychromy, Architectural and Structural: "The book aims at an analysis of the theory and practice of polychromy as practised in architecture and sculpture by the Greeks of the sixth and fifth centuries B.C. in order 'to provide the architect and sculptor with simple maxims for guidance.' The author over-labours many of his points and brings in irrelevant aesthetic on matters that are obvious to every practical designer. Nevertheless, his book is of importance, as it is written on a subject which badly needs handling, and it has the great merit of a sound outlook about unreliable data. It is a real advantage to the
practical designer who has no time for archaeological research to be told what sources he can trust. [But, in his theories,] Mr. Solon is not always convincing." (Review by D. T. F., The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 44, Part 2 (1924), pp. 308-309)

In the 1920s, and during the Depression in the 1930s, Leon Solon put his theories of color in architecture and sculpture to practical use. In 1927 "New York was the site of the Architectural and Allied Arts Exposition. [...Solon participated in a] forum that discussed 'modernistic views on color schemes in skyscrapers.' [Other participants] included architects Raymond Hood and Julian Clarence Levi,...and sculptor John Gregory. [While] Hood predicted that whole buildings [...would have one distinct color,] Solon strongly disagreed, ...saying 'The tendency will be to color the embellishments. It is not likely that one color will predominate in the entire building. One must be careful of the visibility of his colors. The areas of ornamentation will be carefully judged so the color will carry for a good distance.'" (Susan Tunick, "The Evolution of Terra Cotta: 'Glazing New Trails'", APT Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2001, pp. 5-6) While Hood favored "large masses of color--...to achieve Art Deco splendor...," Solon believed that "Color under no circumstances can be regarded as having structural significance... . Its obvious purpose in application is decorative." (Regina Lee Blaszczyk, The Color Revolution, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012, pp. 200-201)

Three of Solon's architectural coloring projects were Ely Jacques Kahn's 2 Park Avenue Building in Manhattan, the coloring of some facade elements and of Carl Paul Jennewein’s pediment sculpture grouping on the Philadelphia Museum of Art, and the coloring of many of the sculptural elements in the Rockefeller Center complex in New York City--especially those of Lee Lawrie and C. Paul Jennewein.


2 Park Avenue
(Photo courtesy of Anomalous_A)
"Two Park Avenue was designed by one of New York City’s most prominent 20th century architects – Ely Jacques Kahn – in an Art Deco/Modernist architectural style. The 28-story tower was built between 1926 and 1928: of the 50 office buildings he designed in Midtown Manhattan, Two Park Avenue remains one of Kahn’s most dramatic and successful works." (http://www.greenbuildingsnyc.com/properties/two-park-avenue/


(Photo courtesy of Anomalous_A)


"Kahn’s use of colored terra cotta on 2 Park Avenue, was a high point in the development of his ornamental vocabulary. Kahn wanted to replace the historically-inspired ornament of previous eras with broad areas of texture and color on his buildings. He advocated that, 'Flat surfaces [should] take the place of the obsolete cornices and finally color in surfaces, in proportion to the distance from the observer, mark the accents that the artist desires.' Kahn also observed that instead of a profusion of ornament, a modern designer should 'introduce in his work precisely that quality of interest that the musician understands by rhythm, accent or colour.' This type of wall treatment was also being employed by Ralph Walker in his large telephone company buildings and reflects the ideas of the German and Dutch Expressionists who looked back to the early Gothic tradition in northern Germany for its expressive use of brick. The buildings from this period had a variety and richness to their surfaces that appealed to Kahn. 


(Photo courtesy of Anomalous_A)
"...Above the 17th story, the intersections of verticals and horizontals are indicated by blue terra cotta squares in the spandrels, emphasizing the effect of woven fabric. Kahn later admitted that in these designs, 'I was thinking of the texture of fabric.' Panels of bright blue, red, green, yellow and black terra cotta, some plain and some molded with intricate patterns are integrated into the design. They are especially obvious near the top floors of each section making these sections stand out rather than recede with distance the way they would on other tall buildings. Kahn had been trying to introduce color into his buildings for some time. He hoped that color would 'supplement and maybe replace the play of light and shadow of traditional ornament…The possibilities of strong contrasts of colors eliminating futile carving and crockets, pinnacles and similar appendages of the early skyscraper are unlimited.' For the designs of 2 Park Avenue, Kahn consulted with colorist Leon Solon to determine the best choices.(Landmarks Preservation Commission, "2 Park Avenue Building", April 18, 2006, pp. 5-6; http://www.nyc.gov/html/lpc/downloads/pdf/reports/2ParkAvenue.pdf)

Solon and Kahn conducted a color experiment. They installed a full-size, full-color model of part of the terra cotta on the roof of the unfinished building. "This experiment provided some idea of how the colors would change under differing light conditions and what their impact would be from street level...since the terra cotta did not begin until the seventeenth story... ." (Susan Tunick, Terra-Cotta Skyline, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1997, p. 75) This experiment was similar to what Solon, C. Paul Jennewein and John Gregory did when they worked on the Philadelphia Museum of Art.


(Photo courtesy of Anomalous_A)
"The main difference between the decorative details on Two Park Avenue and those of more traditional buildings was that Kahn's ornament became an integral part of the facade rather than being merely applied to the surface. Kahn considered the mass as a whole, dividing it into areas of colored terra cotta appropriately scaled to the building. The architectural detail was created by varying the surfaces of the terra cotta so that shadows or holes would be produced by their projections or recesses." (Susan Tunick, Terra-Cotta Skyline, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, 1997, p. 75) This view mirrored Solon's theories of architectural polychromy.

The passing years did not treat the building well. "2 Park Avenue had undergone a series of clumsy renovations in the 1970s resulting in a confused building whose original glory had been mostly obscured. Careful study of original building documents and historical photos, combined with building probes and exploration, determined what elements were primary and what had been added later...[and an appropriate restoration was more recently completed]." (http://www.studios.com/projects/2_park_avenue)



The Philadelphia Museum of Art



North Portico and Pediment, Philadelphia Museum of Art. (HABS-PA-1661-6)

“Philadelphia celebrated the 100th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence with the 1876 Centennial Exhibition, America's first World's Fair. Its art building, Memorial Hall, was intended to outlast the Exhibition and house a permanent museum. Following the example of London's South Kensington Museum, the new museum was to focus on applied art and science, and provide a school to train craftsmen in drawing, painting, modeling, and designing. The Pennsylvania Museum and School of Industrial Art opened on May 10, 1877. Its permanent collection began with objects from the Exhibition and gifts from the public impressed with the Exhibition's ideals of good design and craftsmanship. 



(Photographer, Ed Uthman; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pediment,_Philly_Art_Museum_(2).jpg)
“The City Council of Philadelphia funded a competition in 1895 to design a new museum building, but it was not until 1907 that plans were first made to construct it on Fairmount, a rocky hill topped by the city's main reservoir. The final design is mostly credited to two architects…: Howell Lewis Shay for the building's plan and massing, and Julian Abele for the detail work and perspective drawings. Construction of the Main Building began in 1919, [but, because…]of shortages caused by World War I and other delays, the new building was not completed until 1928. The facade and columns are made of Minnesota dolomite. The building's eight pediments were intended to be adorned with sculpture groups, but only one was completed: "Western Civilization" (1933) by C. Paul Jennewein, with painted terra-cotta figures depicting Greek gods and goddesses [colored by Leon V. Solon].”   (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Museum_of_Art) 


Leon Solon described the process they went through to make a polychromatic building according to classical Greek principles of coloring architectural and sculptural subjects:

“The idea of reviving the practice of polychromy in the new museum building germinated in the fertile imagination of Charles L. Borie, of the firm of Borie, Zantzinger and Medary, of Philadelphia. ...only a small minority of the profession realize that polychromatic decoration was inseparably connected with Greek architectural design,...not as an occasional and minor embellishment, but as a dominant factor in all exterior effect. ...When [...Eli Price, the Chairman of the Fairmount Park Commission’s Committee on the Museum] grasped the extent of polychromatic practice in Greece, and the feasibility of producing an equivalent effect...in the museum building, he became an enthusiastic supporter of  the Borie project… . ...he and Borie decided that every...precaution should be taken to assure satisfactory results. The first step was to order an eighth scale model of one of the smaller pavilions, upon which all color decoration could be developed. The services of the writer [Solon] were retained as polychromist… . ...Borie...communicated with the late Professor Goodyear in order that those refinements which [Goodyear] had recorded in connection with the Parthenon and other famous Greek structures might be applied to the new [museum] building. The next stage was to commence the polychrome decoration in accordance with Greek practice. ...A small section of the entablature and a column cap were supplied to [me] for the development of ornamental detail and color arrangement. When [...a] satisfactory result was realized, the detail was drawn in pen-outline, reproduced, and printed upon thin paper so that it might be stuck upon the moldings and colored… ." 
 (Leon V. Solon, “The Philadelphia Museum of Art”, Atlantic Terra Cotta, Vol. VIII, No. 11, February 1927, pp. 1, 3)


Coloring detail of the column cap and entablature from the Atlantic Terra Cotta brochure.


John Gregory, c. 1921
(Arts & Decoration, Vol. XV,
No. 1, May 1921, p. 22)
At this point sculptors had to be chosen who were willing to work with a colorist. Borie selected C. Paul Jennewein and John Gregory to work on the sculptures for the pediments. 

Then, “A similar experimental process was adopted with pediment groups that had proven so valuable with the polychrome ornamentation. Small groups, made to the scale of the model, were roughly decorated with color and placed in the colored pediment. [Corrections and changes were made, and when] each group had finally reached a stage of development which appeared to leave no detail in doubt, they were cast in plaster and shellaced ready for coloring. [As polychromist, Solon viewed color as…] a dynamic force which could link together or completely separate features in composition. Brilliant colors were used...being adaptable to conditions of visibility at long range." 
(Leon V. Solon, “The Philadelphia Museum of Art”, Atlantic Terra Cotta, Vol. VIII, No. 11, February 1927, p. 3)


A sculptural grouping model with and without color (both photos b&w) from the Atlantic Terra Cotta brochure.




(Photo courtesy of Michael Padwee, 2014)

While Solon was the colorist, Jennewein was responsible for the modeling of all the architectural detail. “All models were made to terra-cotta scale, cast in plaster and treated with color and gold; then taken out of doors and hoisted about fifty feet. In most cases ornamental scale which appeared...satisfactory in the studio underwent radical change [at fifty feet]; this necessitated remodelling, recoloring, [etc.]." (Leon V. Solon, “The Philadelphia Museum of Art”, Atlantic Terra Cotta, Vol. VIII, No. 11, February 1927, p. 4)


Because only one of eight pediment sculptural groupings was completed, John Gregory’s contributions are known only through the one-third scale models and photographs. (From the Atlantic Terra Cotta brochure)

Solon concludes that the “Greek principle [of coloring] was absolutely adhered to; this consists in restricting color to decorative features and developing color elaboration in inverse relation to structural significance. ...the main aim was to produce a distinctive color quality upon each member or feature, to prevent unrelated items associating in effect through similarity of coloring.” (Leon V. Solon, “The Philadelphia Museum of Art”, Atlantic Terra Cotta, Vol. VIII, No. 11, February 1927, p. 4)


According to one newspaper article, in 1927 a "...30 foot replica of a portion of the new Philadelphia Museum of Art [was] constructed, accurate in every detail, of Minnesota limestone and terra cotta, to display the working out of the long-forgotten art of Greece. ...The portion of the building reproduced [...for the annual exhibit of the Architectural League of New York] embodies the color designs of Leon V. Solon, and the sculptural work of John Gregory and Paul Jennewein." ...Architects all over the country have expressed interest in the revival of colors and the League has accorded the exhibit a central position at the exhibition."  ("Architects to Show Revived Greek Art", Springfield [MA] Republican, February 20, 1927, p. 66)


(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:
CPJ_Americanart.si.edu.jpg
 “Noted classical and art deco sculptor C. Paul Jennewein [1890-1978] lived in Larchmont, New York, from 1924 until his death… . Among his best known works are: the main entrance of the British Empire Building at Rockefeller Center; four stone pylons for the 1939 World's Fair representing the Four Elements; two pylons, painted in the Egyptian style that flank the entrance to the Brooklyn Public Library; 


The facade of the main branch of the Brooklyn Public Library at Grand Army Plaza, and the entrance with pylons designed by Jennewein. (Photos courtesy of Michael Padwee)



"allegorical relief panels in the White House Executive Mansion; marble sculptures at the entrance to the Rayburn House of Representatives Office Building; the sculptural decoration, including statues, pediments, and reliefs, for the U.S. Department of Justice Building; and thirteen sculptures of Greek [deities] in the central pediment of the Philadelphia Museum of Art. His work for the Philadelphia Museum of Art was awarded the Medal of Honor of the Architectural League. In the Larchmont area, Jennewein designed the Neptune silhouettes that have marked the Larchmont Village limits for decades, and the bronze statue incorporated into the War Memorial in front of Mamaroneck Village Hall.”  (Originally submitted by: Nita M. Lowey, Representative, 18th District; http://lcweb2.loc.gov/diglib/legacies/NY/200003401.html)



(From the Atlantic Terra Cotta brochure)





(Photo courtesy of Michael Padwee, 2014)


Of the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Jennewein said it was “...developed in accord with archeological discoveries and on a different aesthetic basis than a commercial building… . Aesthetically the new building will show the advantage of the use of color as employed in Greek architecture before the third century B.C., in its proper functioning. ...The sculpted figures in the pediments of the Philadelphia Museum were all designed for color.” (“Color Treatment In City Buildings: C. Paul Jennewein Explains How Pleasing External Effects May Be Obtained”, The New York Times, Jan. 30, 1927, reprinted in Atlantic Terra Cotta, Vol. VIII, No. 11, February 1927)


The John Gregory pediment model from the Atlantic Terra Cotta brochure.

According to Susan K. Anderson, the Martha Hamilton Morris Archivist at the Philadelphia Museum of Art, “As for the ⅓ scale model of the pediments, only the Gregory...model still exists. It used to be located in the sub-basement of our Museum... .” 
 (Email from Susan K. Anderson to Michael Padwee dated 03/01/13, titled “RE: Use of Archives and Finding Aids”)

One reviewer stated that the Museum was "a model of Greek Ionic architecture... . There are forty columns, some of these sixty-four feet high and over eight feet in diameter... . ...Architecturally, the building should please any classicist. It is correct to the last detail, a meticulous exemplar in archaeology... . ...There is color, for instance, plenty of it, used as the old Greek preferred; color in the capitals and cornices and several other architectural features-the solid, deep, but glazed color of terracotta. But more than that, there are to be pediment groups in full color... . These high-lights are set off against walls and shafts of Minnesota dolomite, cut from five strata to gain color advantage. ...This building exemplifies also a thorough adherence to the principle of "optical refinements." Perspective and the human eye play havoc with long straight lines, both vertical and horizontal... . Such lines in a building require studied modulation to rectify optical effects. In other words, the ridge of a terracotta roof is constructed as a shallow arc,...and then to the eye it seems straight and true. ...Similarly, to aid the effect of firmness, the columns all slope inward... ." "So the Greeks worked out the living quality of their temples and so here the architects have with consummate skill wrought these refinements into their museum building." (Richard F. Bach, "A Philadelphian Acropolis: The New Building of the Pennsylvania Museum", The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol. 23, No. 6 (Jun., 1928), pp. 160-166)




The Architect and the Industrial Arts

In 1929 the Metropolitan Museum of Art mounted an exhibit, The Architect and the Industrial Arts--An Exhibition of Contemporary American Design, with the motivating factor that this was art by the American designer for American industries, more specifically, of the architect as designer. "[...With] his strong position in relation to the manufacturing world and his strategic position with regard to the dictation of styles to be used, [the exhibit] has been able to give an illuminating exposition of what might result in the realm of design if the designed himself were to occupy a position of authority." (H.W. Kent, "The Motive of the Exhibition of American Industrial Art", The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 4, Apr. 1929, p. 97) 

Leon Solon, now a Ceramic Designer for the Robertson Art Tile Works in Trenton, New Jersey, was on the Exhibit's select "Co-Operating Committee", which organized the exhibit and which, besides Solon, consisted of Armistead Fitzhugh, Raymond M. Hood, Ely Jacques Kahn, John W. Root, Eliel Saarinen, Eugene Schoen, Joseph Urban, and Ralph T. Walker, all architects.


The Backyard Garden, designed by Ely Jacques Kahn, included a colored tile fountain and orange-tile fountain wall executed by the Robertson Art Tile Works. (http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015023511937; The Architect and the Industrial Arts: An Exhibition of Contemporary American Design, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Feb. 12-Sept. 2, 1929, p. 34) 

Central Garden Feature designed by Armistead Fitzhugh, Landscape Architect. Tiles designed by Leon Solon, executed by the Robertson Art Tile Company and set by the William H. Jackson Company. (http://hdl.handle.net/2027/mdp.39015023511937The Architect and the Industrial Arts: An Exhibition of Contemporary American Design, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, Feb. 12-Sept. 2, 1929, p. 82) 

Of this exhibit and Leon Solon's contribution, Richard F. Bach writes that "[These] specifically designed objects have been brought together in group displays that simulate room arrangements but are not necessarily treated with the finality of a problem in decoration involving the personality of a client, as would be the case commercially. …For several years it had been the Museum's desire to offer an exhibition American-designed and American-made throughout, but the form that this presentation should take was not at first clear… . […At] a meeting of the Advisory Committee on Industrial Art, …the first suggestion was made…for a concerted arrangement of objects from various industries. This […idea] was developed further…particularly by Léon V. Solon of the Robertson Art Tile Company, enlisting such enthusiasm and encouragement that the feasibility was considered of presenting the unified collaborative exhibition which has now been realized." (Richard F. Bach, "American Industrial Art: An Exhibition of Contemporary Design", The Metropolitan Museum of Art Bulletin, Vol. 24, No. 2, Feb. 1929, pp. 40-41)  


Rockefeller Center

"Atlas", sculpted by Lee Lawrie. (Photo courtesy of Michael Padwee)
The art-deco Rockefeller Center complex was built between Fifth and Sixth (i.e., Avenue of the Americas) Avenues and 48th and 51st Streets.The space for Rockefeller Center was leased “...from Columbia University in 1928 and developed...from 1930 [to 1939]. Rockefeller initially planned a syndicate to build an opera house for the Metropolitan Opera on the site, but changed his mind after the stock market crash of 1929 and the Metropolitan's continual delays to hold out for a more favorable lease… . Rockefeller...took on the enormous project as the sole financier, on a 27-year lease (with the option for three 21-year renewals for a total of 87 years) for the site from Columbia; negotiating a line of credit with the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and covering ongoing expenses through the sale of oil company stock. The initial cost of acquiring the space and razing some of the building and construction of new building was an estimated $250,000,000 dollars; a staggering sum in 1930.” 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_Center)


A sculpture by Lee Lawrie at 30 Rockefeller Plaza colored by Leon Solon, once the art director of the American Encaustic Tiling Company. “Sculpted by Lee Lawrie, the imposing low-relief[, 37 foot high] panel, Wisdom, was insalled over the entrance to the main building of Rockefeller Center… .” (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/454792763/in/pool-327670@N25/; 2012 photo courtesy of Michael Padwee)
“Rockefeller Center represents a turning point in the history of architectural sculpture: it is among the last major building projects in the United States to incorporate a program of integrated public art. 


A model for Lee Lawrie's sculptural treatment above the main entrance to Rockefeller Center. (Architecture, Vol. LXVI, No. 5, Nov. 1932, p. 273)
"Sculptor Lee Lawrie contributed the largest number of individual pieces – twelve – including the statue of Atlas facing Fifth Avenue and the conspicuous friezes above the main entrance to the RCA Building. 
Two other sculptures by Lee Lawrie and colored by Leon Solon flanking the entrance to 30 Rockefeller Plaza. “Sound and Light, [were] installed over the entrance to the main building of Rockefeller Center, 30 Rockefeller Plaza. The two 5-foot low-relief panels represent the cosmic forces derived from Wisdom, which they flank… . Lawrie's art deco carvings on indiana limestone with cast glass and gilding accents herald the arrival of radio (sound) and the motion picture industry and television (light).” (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/451861786/in/pool-lee_lawrie/; Photos courtesy of Michael Padwee)


"Paul Manship's highly recognizable bronze gilded statue of the Greek legend of the Titan Prometheus recumbent, bringing fire to mankind, features prominently in the sunken plaza at the front of 30 Rockefeller Plaza. A large number of other artists contributed work at the Center, including Isamu Noguchi,...Carl Milles, Hildreth Meiere, Margaret Bourke-White, Dean Cornwell, and Leo Friedlander [and Henry Varnum Poor]." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rockefeller_Center)

"Lee Lawrie's The Story of Mankind, a massive carved limestone Art Deco sculptural grill has adroned the entrance to the International Building at 29 West 50th Street, since its installtion in September 1937. Serving a dual purpose--chronicling the progress of mankind, as well as symbolizing the purpose of the International Building, Lawrie divided the screen into fifteen small rectangular spaces contained carved images he called 'hieroglyphs'." (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/451862334/in/pool-lee_lawrie/; Above photo courtesy of Michael Padwee)
"A major unifying factor of Rockefeller Center art is that much of it consists of bas-relief cut into limestone, in many cases highlighted with gold and strong primary colors. ...Ceramicist Leon V. Solon revived [...the color schemes of the ancients, which had fallen into disuse] for Rockefeller Center. By chance, Solon learned that...the German manufacturer Keim had developed a paint that bonded to limestone and formed a resistant surface. ...For his first assignment Solon colored Wisdom, Sound and Light [...over] the entrance to 30 Rockefeller Plaza. The results were so stunning that Solon was engaged as the colorist for the entire Rockefeller Center project...[and submitted] eighty-seven different color schemes." (Suzanne Loebl, America's Medicis: the Rockefellers and Their Astonishing Cultural Legacy, Harper Collins Publishers, New York, NY, 2010, p. 105)

"The 'story' begins at the bottom center, with four sterotypical figures depicting the races of mankind: red, white, yellow and black. ...Rene Chambellan worked with Lawrie to create the model, and Leon V. Solon [designed] the coloration." (http://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/451862334/in/pool-lee_lawrie/; Above photo courtesy of Michael Padwee)

No colored terra cotta ornament was used in Rockefeller Center, and this omission helped lead to the the decline of its influence in future construction. "If terra cotta had been an integral part of the Rockefeller Center color scheme, the business outlook for that industry would probably have improved in the years that followed." (Susan Tunick, "The Evolution of Terra Cotta: 'Glazing New Trails'", APT Bulletin, Vol. 32, No. 4, 2001, p. 7)


636 Fifth Avenue. (Photo courtesy of Michael Padwee)


620 Fifth Avenue. (Photo courtesy of Michael Padwee)


610 Fifth Avenue. (Photo courtesy of Michael Padwee)

Even though much of our architecture is not colored as Solon would have liked, because of projects like Rockefeller Center, 2 Park Avenue and the Philadelphia Museum of Art, Leon Solon's architectural color theories live on and continue to enrich us all.

LINKS:
I would like to thank Joe Taylor, Sheila Menzies and Brechelle Ware of the Tile Heritage Foundation for their help with this article. Thanks to Susan Tunick and the Friends of Terra Cotta for her help. Also, to Nick Cashin for the use of the information about, and the photo of the Mintons Secessionist ware vase. (Nick's blog, "UK Pot Heads", is about late 19th-mid 20th century British art pottery.) Thanks to John Hopper and his "Design. Decoration. Craft at The Textile Blog", for permission to use a photo of Solon's textile design, and to Stephen J. Gertz and his blog, "Booktryst: A Nest for Booklovers", for information about the Sutherland bookbinding decoration and G.T. Bagguley, and for the use of a color doublure photo, if needed. Also, thanks to Peter Dakin, Secretary of The Bookplate Society, Anthony Pincott, Treasurer of the Society, and especially to Lew Jaffe, who writes the "Confessions of a Bookplate Junkie" blog, for their help locating a bookplate by Leon Solon. Mr. Cashin's, Mr. Hopper's, Mr. Gertz's and Mr. Jaffe's blogs are highly recommended. Also, thanks to John Critchley, Secretary, and the Antiquarian Booksellers' Association in the UK for their help. My thanks to Anomalous_A for the use of the photos of 2 Park Avenue. Thanks to Woolley and Wallis auctioneers for the use of the photo of the Mintons Secessionist tile panel. And thanks to Prof. George Landow and his Victorian Web website for the information about Solon's textiles, and for the use of the Fine Art Society's (London) color image of Solon's piece, and my thanks to Regina Lee Blaszczyk for her excellent work, The Color Revolution.

To download and read this in pdf form (for individual, non-commercial, educational use only), go to  https://tileresearcharticles.omeka.net/items/show/35. Scroll down to "Files", click on the pdf file and save.

NOTES
1. The BROOKLYN WATERFRONT ARTISTS COALITION (http://www.bwac.org/) is having an exhibit at 499 Van Brunt Street, Red Hook, Brooklyn from September 21-October 20, and on Saturday, Sept. 28th at 2PM, Susan and I will be giving a talk about "The International Tile Company and Other Potteries in 19th Century Brooklyn". Come over and join us in the BWAC screening room.



2. For those interested in stained glass and tiles in Scotland, check out Michael Donnelly's excellent website "Scotland's Stained Glass",  http://www.scotstainedglass.com/index.html. There are two free pdf downloads on the website: "People's Pictures - The story of tiles in Glasgow" by Elspeth King and "Glasgow Stained Glass - A Preliminary Study" by Michael Donnelly.

3. As a fan of the printed word, I would like to recommend a quarterly periodical to anyone interested in art pottery--the Journal of the American Art Pottery Association. The last issue, Summer 2013, for instance, has three excellent articles: Susan J. Montgomery's "Grueby's Jungle Book Tiles: A Fascinating Fireplace for the Nursery"; Richard D. Mohr's "Teco's Arts & Crafts Art Tiles: Art Tiles in the Prairie School, Part IV-B"; and Michael Stenson's "Norse Pottery". I have used the research of Susan Montgomery and Richard Mohr many times in past articles.